> According to the replies i got so far, sgid bit on directories > dont represent a risk. Then, I still wonder why tiger classifies this as an > 'ALERT'? I guess they're not making differences between files and directories (that's a bit surprising) and they don't like to find that many setgid files. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=-=- Herve Schauer Consultants -=-=- roberto@hsc.fr.net -=-=-=-=-=- Support The Free UNIX Systems ! FreeBSD NetBSD Linux -=-=-=-=-=-